jump to navigation

Investment and Evangelism March 6, 2009

Posted by absurdemest in Uncategorized.
add a comment

Mark 8:3-38
“Then he began to teach them that the Son of Man must undergo great suffering, and be rejected by the elders, and the chief priests, and the scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again. He said all this quite openly.”

One of the commentaries I read pointed out something that I had never noticed before. What does it mean when Jesus says that the Son of Man “must” do these things? He didn’t say “will” or “should” but “must”. Is he saying that his suffering and death are not a part of God’s plan but instead the way he understood his personal call? Is he saying he’d rather not but God is pretty insistent about it?
(more…)

Temptation and ministry. Where are they? February 28, 2009

Posted by absurdemest in Uncategorized.
4 comments

Mark 1:9-15
“In those days, Jesus came from Nazareth of Galilee ans was baptized by John in the Jordan. And just as he was coming out of the water, he saw the heavens torn apart and the Spirit descending like a dove on him. And a voice came from heaven, ‘You are my Son, the Beloved; with you I am well pleased.’”
The first insight I have here is hardly interesting or innovative. However, I have to say that it seems to me that Jesus is the only one who sees the Spirit and hears the voice. I find this important for two reasons. The first is that it underscores the interior, personal aspect of relationship with God. The second, related, reason is that it reminds us that, even when we are dealing with the Son of God, we cannot expect to see the visions and miracles we ask for as signs. We have to trust in what God teaches us, and compare that to those who claim to speak in his name. (more…)

Jesus, Super White Guy February 19, 2009

Posted by absurdemest in Uncategorized.
add a comment

Mark 9:2-10
“Six days later, Jesus took with him Peter and James and John, and led them up a high mountain apart, by themselves.”
After proclaiming last week my undying love for the immediacy with which everything happens in Mark, we have this passage that begins “[s]ix days later”. What the hell? Six days after Peter’s confession of Christ, Peter’s misunderstanding of Messiahship, and one of my favorite of Jesus’ teachings, they do this thing. I can’t figure out why. There’s no indication what day this might be, so there doesn’t seem to be a sabbath teaching. Why the wait? Or is this just one of those historical particularities that don’t really have any significance? (more…)

And immediately he returned to blogging, and at once the internet was changed. February 12, 2009

Posted by absurdemest in Uncategorized.
add a comment

Mark 1:40-45
“A leper came to him begging him, and kneeling he said to him, ‘If you choose, you can make me clean.’”
Maybe it’s just because of the narrow range of commentaries I look to, but I was surprised that I didn’t read much about the odd formulation of the leper’s question. How one understands “[i]f you choose” will significantly affect one’s choice in the textual variant in v. 41. Is the leper being presumptuous, or is he truly concerned about Jesus’ desire to purify him? (more…)

Listening to the Story July 10, 2008

Posted by absurdemest in Uncategorized.
add a comment

Matthew 13:1-9
Call me a Jesus Seminarian (Seminar-ite? Seminar-izer?), but I’m cutting short the reading for this week. I don’t think Jesus gave the explanation that the lectionary includes, so rather than read it from the pulpit and ignore it, I’ll just leave it out.
(more…)

Abe and Ike … learning not to hate the story June 23, 2008

Posted by Will Deuel in Abraham, Genesis, Isaac, Leonard Sweet.
2 comments

I’ve never liked the story of Abraham and Isaac.  Not an easy confession to make publicly, but true nonetheless.  Or is it the traditional, pious interpretation that I don’t like?  I’m not sure.

But I just can’t buy the idea that God would ask Abraham to sacrifice his son – that God would ask Abraham to commit an immoral act to test his faith.  That seems wrong to me on so many levels it’s not even funny.

Leonard Sweet offers the only interpretation of this text that I can accept. Sweet asks twenty questions of the text, some of which I’ll reprint here.  These come from his excellent book Out of the Question… Into the Mystery.

  1. Why didn’t Abraham argue with God about the killing of his innocent son like he did when God told Abraham about God’s intention to kill the Sodomites’ sons and daughters?
  2. Why did Abraham keep the planned sacrifice a secret from those closest to him?  Why didn’t he tell Sarah, Eliezer, or Isaac about what God had ordered him to do?
  3. Why did God no longer speak to Abraham after the outcome of this test was known?  God delivered the Mount Moriah test in person, but as Abraham was about to carry out the command, an angel intervened and stayed his hand.  Why didn’t God show up to intervene?  And after the conclusion of this episode, God never spoke to Abraham again.  The intimacy of their relationship was over.  Likewise, from that point on, Abraham never “speaks to God” but only “speaks about God.”
  4. How did Isaac deal with the fact that his father had to be forcibly restrained from cutting his throat?  What went through Isaac’s mind as he stared at his father with a blade descending?  Abraham may not have wounded Isaac with a knife, but he wounded him nonetheless.
  5. What did Abraham and Isaac talk about on their three-day journey home?  In fact, it appears more likely that Abraham returned alone to Beersheba.  Abraham climbed Mount Moriah with his son, but he arrived alone when he returned from the mountain.  And he never spoke to his son again.  Isaac never saw his father alive again – only reuniting with his brother Ishmael to bury their dead father.  Even though God gave Abraham back his son on the altar of sacrifice, Abraham never did get his son back.
  6. Is it reading too much into the text to wonder why Isaac grieved for his mother when she died, but the Scriptures say nothing about his grief upon his father’s death?
  7. Why did Sarah die at the end of this story?  Remember that Abraham had not previously told her anything about the purpose of his trip with Isaac to the land of Moriah.  So upon her husband’s return, did she die from shock upon hearing that her son had been spared execution?  Was she devastated that her husband would do such a thing?  It takes Rebekah to comfort Isaac after the death of his mother.  There was no sign of Abraham’s even being there to console his son.
  8. Does God expect followers to commit immoral acts when commanded to do so by divine voices or holy prophets?

Sweet’s attention to detail in these questions impresses me deeply.  The whole chapter is worth re-reading in preparation for the sermon this week, and the whole book is worth reading anyway.  Sweet argues that there are really two tests taking place here: a faithfulness test (which Abraham passes) and a relationship test (which Abraham fails miserably).  After coming down from the mountain Abraham travels home (most likely alone) and lives in isolation from his most beloved for the rest of his life – including God.

If that’s what you get for passing the test, then I would want to fail.  Srsly.

I have had the experience of asking tough questions of the text during bible study and being told, “it’s like you’re tearing down everything we believe in!”  Some folks just aren’t ready for deconstruction, even when the traditional interpretation (the Absorbed Reading, if you will) seems to demand it.

And (virtually) no text cries out for a radical reinterpretation than this one.

As a pastor I plan to discuss my own struggles with this text from the pulpit.

I Desire Mercy: Matthew 9:13. for June 8, 2008 June 2, 2008

Posted by Will Deuel in Uncategorized.
Tags:
add a comment

A colleague-friend told me just this week that he was once raked over the coals in a Sunday School class for suggesting that the book of Jonah was a parable rather than a piece of literal history.  That’s reflective of a source of tension in our churches now.  There are those who suggest that if you don’t take every word as literally factual then you deny the authority of the scriptures.  Atheists and fundamentalists have that in common – Bill Maher (an avowed atheist and former Catholic) asserts that “you either believe in the talking snake or you don’t,” and that if you’re going to believe then you “have to swallow the whole wafer.”

I don’t think it’s as simple as that.  There are truths that metaphor, narrative and parable communicate far more effectively than historical, biological claims can.  Jesus understood that.  He didn’t expect his listeners to believe that the parable of, say, the wicked vineyard workers was an event that really happened in history – he expected them to hear some truths about God in the narrative.

One of my seminary profs had a great saying.  “All those people who want me to take every word literally ought to read this one – ‘God is love.’ Why can’t they seem to take THAT one literally?”

Here’s one for you.  “Go and learn what this means, ‘I desire mercy, not sacrifice.’  For I have come to call not the righteous but sinners.”

That’s problematic for Christians.  Nearly all of the “acceptable, orthodox (small o)” theology in our churches is centered around sacrifice.  Get yourself washed in the fountain filled with the blood of the lamb who died on the cross because you are bad, as a propitiation for your sins and your sinful nature.  God sacrificed his son for YOU, the least you can do is be a Christian.  Look at them nail-scarred hands.  He suffered for you and because of you.  The sacrifice of the sinless, spotless lamb appeased God who is angry at you to keep you from God’s wrath.

I can’t help but think that Jesus would take one look at our hymnals and say, “What is up with all those blood hymns?  What part of ‘I DESIRE MERCY, NOT SACRIFICE’ do you not understand?”

Yes, I know Paul writes a lot – an awful lot – about the sacrifice of Christ.  But never forget that the most common sermon he preached (three times in Acts alone) was about his encounter with the risen, LIVING Christ.  Not the dead, bloody one.

We have conflated God’s mercy with sacrifice.  Sacrifice is now considered a good thing.  Describing someone as being self-sacrificing or longsuffering is a compliment.  Therefore asking people in churches to engage in mission and ministries is literally asking them to sacrifice.  In order to visit folks in the nursing home they have to sacrifice time with their children or the ballgame or Dancing With the Has-Beens.

But is being merciful really such a sacrifice?  Honestly, yes.  In order to be truly merciful we may have to make sacrifices.  We have to sacrifice our negative attitudes about our neighbors.  Our stereotypes and prejudices.  Our racism, sexism, ageism, etc.  Our preconceived notions about others.  Things that are worth sacrificing.

What if we took Jesus seriously here?  What if it’s not all about the blood and the suffering and the sacrifice?  What if it’s not about appeasing an angry God?  What if God isn’t a monster, but a merciful and loving God?

I rock at humility. May 29, 2008

Posted by absurdemest in Uncategorized.
add a comment

Matthew 7:21-29
“‘Not everyone who says to me, “Lord, Lord,” will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my father in heaven. On that day, many will say to me, “Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many deeds of power in your name?” The I will declare to them, “I never knew you; go away from me, you evildoers.”
(more…)

A lot of processy-sounding BS. Ain’t I smart? May 8, 2008

Posted by absurdemest in Uncategorized.
add a comment

Acts 2:1-21
I’m always interested in the narrative structure of the biblical books, and Luke never disappoints. The Magnificat preceding Jesus’ birth, the opening of his public ministry by reading Isaiah to his home town, and having Jesus ascend into space to cap off his ministry are all interesting things to explore. A lot of what he does is similar to how comic books tell stories, as I talked about in a sermon once. There was limited space, so everything included had to be important, like Spider-Man letting the guy who later killed his Uncle Ben escape. Each detail is significant.
(more…)

Christ has made a strong foundation, if only we’d build there. May 2, 2008

Posted by absurdemest in Uncategorized.
Tags: ,
add a comment

Luke 24:44-53
It always annoys me when the lectionary takes one chunk of a longer sermon or teaching by Jesus and uses it as the pericope. It always seems so random and thoughtless. It’s something I struggle with theologically, because most of these longer teachings are probably cobbled together in the first place from different teachings and sayings. However, if we take seriously the final forms of the gospels, which, ultimately, are the only version of Jesus we have, then slicing them up and disassembling them again can hide the evangelists’ meanings. I think this is one such time. (more…)